Kendrick Lamar's 'A' Necklace at 2025 Super Bowl Nods at His Famous Drake Diss Track

Mar. 15, 2025

Kendrick Lamar, Drake.Photo:Gregory Shamus/Getty; Cole Burston/Getty

Gregory Shamus/Getty; Cole Burston/Getty

Kendrick Lamarmade a major statement with one of his accessories at the2025 Super Bowl.

On Sunday, Feb. 9, the rapper, 37, headlined theHalftime Showat the Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, where the Kansas City Chiefs are playing the Philadelphia Eagles.

Lamar performed his hit “Not Like Us,” which recentlywon record of the yearat the 2025 Grammy awards. The song serves as adiss trackaimed at fellow rapperDrakein which he calls the Canadian musician a pedophile and a “colonizer.” While Lamar altered one particularly scathing lyric (he omitted last word from the line “Certified Lover Boy? Certified pedophiles”, which refers toDrake’s 2021 albumCertified Lover Boy), he made sure to send a message with his ensemble.

In addition toflare jeans and a bold jacketthat read “Gloria” across the front in capital letters, Lamar sported a diamond Rahaminov brooch worth $68,000 on his hat and a massive “a” chain, among other jewels. The “a” necklace seemingly nods to another lyric from “Not Like Us”: “Tryna strike a chord and it’s probably A minor.”

Kendrick Lamar at the 2025 Super Bowl.Gregory Shamus/Getty

Gregory Shamus/Getty

In response to “Not Like Us,” which was released in May 2024, Drakefiled a law suitagainst Universal Music Group, his own record label since 1009, for releasing and promoting the track.

The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now!

Kendrick Lamar performs at the 2025 Super Bowl.Christopher Polk/Penske Media via Getty

Christopher Polk/Penske Media via Getty

The lawsuit alleges that “Not Like Us” was “intended to convey the specific, unmistakable, and false factual allegation that Drake is a criminal pedophile, and to suggest that the public should resort to vigilante justice in response.”

Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE’s free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

“Not only are these claims untrue, but the notion that we would seek to harm the reputation of any artist—let alone Drake—is illogical. We have invested massively in his music and our employees around the world have worked tirelessly for many years to help him achieve historic commercial and personal financial success," a spokesperson for UMG told PEOPLE in a statement.

They continued: “We have not and do not engage in defamation — against any individual.  At the same time, we will vigorously defend this litigation to protect our people and our reputation, as well as any artist who might directly or indirectly become a frivolous litigation target for having done nothing more than write a song.”

source: people.com