Richard Glossip.Photo: Janelle Stecklein, Community Newspaper Holdings Inc. via AP
The 5-3 decision was made Tuesday, Feb. 25, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing in her majority opinion, “We conclude that the prosecution violated its constitutional obligation to correct false testimony,“ABC NewsandNBC Newsreports. “We reverse the judgement below and remand the case for a new trial.”
Glossip, who has always maintained his innocence in the 1997 killing of his boss, Barry Van Treese, has been behind bars for decades and had nine scheduled execution dates, theAssociated Pressreported.
After striking a plea deal, Sneed received a sentence of life in prison without parole, while Glossip was sentenced to the death.
In its decision, the Supreme Court said prosecutors failed to correct Sneed’s false testimony and did not disclose his psychiatric condition, the AP reports. The court added that prosecutors destroyed evidence and withheld witness statements.
Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up forPEOPLE’s free True Crime newsletterfor breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.
“Because Sneed’s testimony was the only direct evidence of Glossip’s guilt of capital murder, the jury’s assessment of Sneed’s credibility was necessarily determinative here,” Sotomayor said in her opinion, per NBC News.
A new trial date has not been set.
“Rich Glossip, who has maintained his innocence for 27 years, will now be given the chance to have the fair trial that he has always been denied,” Knight said.
source: people.com